Home > Center > Note Detail
Kuzuhavtu Notes(16)

Game reviews and game recommendation

✿Afk journey
Please don't misunderstand, I think it's a fantastic game overall. I adore the expansive open-world map, the charming little details like being able to pet cats, and the convenient public message outposts scattered throughout different locations. Additionally, I appreciate the unified equipment system for heroes of the same class.
However, I'm not particularly fond of the concept of earning glory points through rankings and "activeness," especially since it seems to disproportionately benefit players who spend money on the game. I feel sorry for solo players and those who prefer not to spend money, as they end up grinding endlessly only to be disregarded and discriminated against in terms of rewards and in arena matches. Even some guilds exhibit this discriminatory behavior. It's disheartening to see such toxicity emerge so rapidly, especially considering that the game hasn't even been officially released yet.
By the way, I'm not a fan of the portrait layout either.

✿Pixel Heroes
Good game but it's p2w to get quickly growth

✿Tales of Grimm
I rarely take the time to review a game, mainly because I usually lose interest too quickly. However, this one has truly captivated me. Perhaps it's my enduring fascination with dark fairy tales. I use the term broadly, encompassing more than just the Brothers Grimm's tales as the name suggests. I've invested about $10 into the game, but overall, the gems are readily available. I recommend saving them up for special summons and avoiding wasteful spending if a 5-star is not guaranteed. Best of luck!

✿Clash Royale
Well, a lot of people complaining that the game is pay to win, but me as a free to play players didn't think so, this game can train your prediction and good for children to play.

✿Call of Duty
I love this game... (Even though it looks horrendous on my phone 😭)


416
Hot Hashtags Next
Hot Games Next
Hot Notes More
Edmond Honda
"QooApp Users Are Dumb" Example 6885437 I made a note regarding how I believe Blue Archive's system is flawed and this specific user not only made a reply to it, but decided to make 3 seperate posts rather than just add to the reply tree. Clearly this user is totally not mad at all [/sarcasm] As you can see in the screenshots, my argument is that if you are 10 or even 20 levels higher than the recommended level, you should be able to clear the CPU with little to no effort. This user instead decides to bring up weaknesses and types, and continues to bang on about it while saying I should use specific characters... in a game that has a crapload of characters. This is what we call "moving the goalposts". This user has no argument, so they instead decide to make it about something else in a way thst gives them the advantage. Weaknesses and types is not what is being discussed. The topic is LEVELS, on the most broad and basic concept. Even if you want to bring types and weaknesses into the conversation, lets take a few examples of other gacha games that do things the CORRECT way... 1. NIKKE - This game has types and weaknesses, but if your level is higher than the CPU, you are able to win against the CPU. Even non yellow characters (Purple/Blue) can clear the CPU with ease on higher levels. Notice how I'm not saying anything bad about this game. 2. LOST SWORD - This game has types and weaknesses but even the basic botton-tier characters can clear the CPU on higher levels. Notice how I'm not saying anything bad about this game. However, because I'm saying something bad about Blue Archive, all of a sudden it's wrong. These people are defending a flawed game and are taking it on a personal level and would rather spew ad hominems instead of sticking with the topic. "oh its just your skill issue" "oh this game isn't for you". These are hand-wavy non-arguments while they hide in their echo chamber and sniff their own farts. Next time someone pulls this kind of crap on you, you should absolutely call them out for it.
28
Get QooApp for Android